Elizabeth Nyland
Greenport, New York

December 26, 2006

To: the Greenport Planning Board

I am here tonight as a Greenport taxpayer who is very concerned that this project will result in higher property taxes for Greenport taxpayers who already pay some of the highest taxes of any town in the county. 
In the 4 years that I have lived in Greenport, Town taxes are up 52%, while County and school taxes were up only 23% and 20% respectively.

In my old neighborhood in Claverack, for the same four years, Town taxes increased only 26%.
When I say taxes, I am talking about the size of the check that had to be written to the tax collector, excluding any available exemptions. I am not talking about the tax rates. 

For the sake of all Greenport taxpayers, please read about the studies in this package. 

They show over and over again that big box projects in general, and Wal-Mart in particular, cost the host community more than they bring in.  Instead, they lead to:

Not only is Greenport already heavily taxed, according to the 2000 US Census, the town has one of the lowest median incomes, and highest percent of population living below the poverty level of all towns in the county.  So, Greenport’s economic profile “fits” with problems associated with the presence of big box stores.  Is it possible that Wal-Mart’s presence has been a contributing factor?

So, I am asking you do three things before giving Widewaters the go-ahead:

  1. Read these study results.  Get educated. Know what you are getting us into before you do it.
  2. Take control of the project. Demand that Widewaters tell you who the tenants are likely to be so you can begin to do the analyses that have to be done to determine if this will be good or bad for us. Parking lots and buildings do not a shopping center make.  What is sold in them, by whom and to whom, will determine whether this center helps or hurts us.  You have to know that before you can make a smart decision.
  3. Give the project the Positive Declaration it merits, so you will have time to get the answers from Widewaters, hire your own experts, and do valid independent analyses of its potential impacts.  Only then will you know what you are approving and the likely results. Too many questions remain unanswered for that to happen now. (See attached list)

The SEQRA law makes this possible, and to not do so, is to not fulfill your obligations to Greenport’s taxpayers.


Sincerely,


Elizabeth Nyland


What Do We Not Yet Know About the Economic Ramifications of the Widewaters Project?

We don’t yet know:

What stores they plan to bring to the center or what kind of merchandise they will carry – EVERYTHING else depends on this. The right mix of stores and merchandise can increase sales and produce positive revenue via sales tax. The wrong mix of stores will do nothing to bring in more sales tax. Traffic estimates also depend on what stores will be here and where they will come from – new or relocated.

So, even with a number of new stores, Greenport could suffer and lose existing businesses — if the new ones just take business from existing stores.  Unless the new stores keep purchases in the area now going out of the area, we won’t benefit.

Who they think will come to shop there – shopper demography – age, gender, where they live, etc.

How many new shoppers can be expected. What estimates have they made as to the numbers of shoppers that will be new to Route 9 as well as their site?

What expected costs will be to the Town and its taxpayers for any town services that must be provided. These costs are likely to the same whether the stores are new or relocated, whether it is successful or not.

Whether there will there be enough new revenue to cover the costs of this center to the Town and taxpayers? Costs will be pretty steady regardless of how much it may bring in new sales tax revenue so it is imperative that there be an analysis of realistic income expectations.

 Net, is the estimated income from taxes going to cover the estimated costs to the Town, or will the taxpayers be put in the position of subsidizing Widewaters through their taxes, and at what level?

It would seem that we know NOTHING about the economic ramifications of this project.  How can it possibly be permitted by the Planning Board with such a glaring lack of information?